It is assumed to be noble to live for
others. This nobility can take many forms and some of them can be very
difficult to identify. Still, in most of the cases the underlying motive is not
benevolent even though the appearance tells a different story. Selfishness has
many disguises.
No
doubt serving and helping others is the highest cause there is, but not always.
It is worthwhile to consider the motive for the help. In many cases the true
motive is not pure and noble, on the contrary, it is an ego trip and boost
without any limits. Hard to believe? Well, if it were really about the others
there shouldn’t be any need for anybody else to know about the aid. Also the
compassionate act should not direct any unnecessary attention to the helper.
Any expectation of reciprocity is not an act of compassion. And this means
anything, including the little word ‘thanks’ from the one you supported.
Helping others can also be a way to reduce one’s guilt of something else in
which case the issue has really nothing to do with helping others. It is just a
means to deal with one’s own conscience.
What
about the target of the help, is it far away and somehow exotic? People in the
next block might as well need your help but is it somehow better if you focus
on greater distance to give your aid? Often it would make more sense to help
people close to you since you can make a larger impact—in addition of being a
practical example for others.
Often
taking care of one’s own business is quickly condemned as selfishness—having
only a negative connotation nowadays. But this is a great fallacy as well. If
everyone was supposed to pay attention only for others without caring for one’s
own needs there wouldn’t be anyone feeling good and balanced anymore. The
reality is exactly the opposite. In order to help others one needs to be in a
solid position to give a helping hand. The only way to give a lot is to have
plenty as well. This does not apply just to material things but basically every
quality and virtue there is. If supporting others is an act of compassion then
it should be carried out with the upmost care and the best possible way. Giving
the best you have is not a light-hearted issue, is it? This is the test you
most likely fail provided that you are not doing it solely for the compassion
and love for others.(Petri Kajander)
The Ten Biggest Myths of Living for the Sake of Others
Myth #1: If you devote yourself
to living for the sake of others, you will lose your freedom.
Myth #2:
Those who live for the sake of others lose out on "the good life."
Myth #3:
Living for others is for saints, priests, and nuns.
Myth #4:
If you live for the sake of others, you will lose your dignity.
Myth #5:
Those who live for the sake of others never discover their "true
self."
Myth #6:
Only weak and dumb people sacrifice themselves for others.
Myth #7:
As soon as you decide to live for the sake of others, you become a person that
others will manipulate and take advantage of.
Myth #8:
Living for the sake of others is unattractive and it doesn't work.
Myth #9: People who live for others aren't happy.
Myth #10:
The only way to achieve anything worthwhile in this life is to put
yourself first.
No comments:
Post a Comment